🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, government authorities and advocacy groups.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities pays for the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent mammals – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.

She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a role that entailed building relationships of the marine predators.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for two female belugas with different temperaments.

“Eve selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Both changed the way I understand relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her connection with the whales progressed against a context of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not reply to a request for comment, but earlier asserted: “The whales … receive far better health care and 24/7 care than any person in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the facility in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to put down. She said the facility believed information of the incident were leaked to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be transferred promptly from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the request would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official wrote. “As the public, we know that belugas belong in the ocean, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an transfer that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the minister’s remarks reveal a wider lack of awareness of the facts of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of food for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be highly debated. The prospective facility, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Others say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the coming months.

An official, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|